Write-up Put up Present day Ontology

I have developed a new branch of know-how named Benefit epistemology. Price epistemology has its mirroring in an ontology (Becoming) that is constructive. There are two varieties of ontology: a person being constructive ontology and the other getting destructive ontology.

Camus and Sartre are philosophers who have espoused a philosophy of ontological destruction. For them lifestyle is chaotic and absurd and obtaining no meaning. They also celebrate a staying heading into a fallen pit of anarchy. Let us choose Camus Fantasy of the Sisyphus. In it a gentleman is condemned by the Gods to roll a boulder all the way uphill only to come across that it rolls down. The guy is pressured to repeat this meaningless chore yet again and once more. I would like to talk to Camus: is everyday living absurd? Is it chaotic! Camus’ philosophy is an incoherent a single. If we abide by Camus philosophy we won’t be capable to stay a life meaningfully. Are not we residing in a modern society where we rejoice the meaning of lifestyle? We are not beings residing in isolation. We are dwelling in a local community of shared meanings- or should really be live as egotistic people. Is existence marked the absence of rationale and passion? We are beings living in three states-Catharsis, Angst and Ecstasy. Which means of existence is existentially recognized.

What does Sartre have to say of Ontological Existentialism? Sartre’s Philosophy also celebrates the that means of the absurd. Existence for him is coherent mass of nothingness. We navigate our existence by negating the indicating of existence. Is lifetime chaotic and absurd? Is the selection we make to free of charge ourselves meaningless a person? Sartre goes on to say that: we are condemned to be absolutely free. How can we say that freedom is our condemnation? Was Sartre a psychological victim of World War II? Why is there so considerably damaging theology in ontological philosophy?

I have go through and reread existential Philosophers like Camus and Sartre and I have made a new branch of existential ontology named constructive ontology. Constructive Ontology produces a new this means that lifestyle is artistic and owning a reason. We have to dwell a daily life in Valueblelization (from Benefit and Realization). Valueblelization signifies a creative living with celebration of sharing meanings in empathic harmony. For Valueblelization to occur an personal is a purposeist from (Purpose and ist). We have to authenticate ourselves in a democratic empathy of sharing meanings.

Summarizing I can say that the Philosophy of Camus and Sartre is damaging and rereading them I have made ontology a constructive just one.